Menu
As the quest for eternal youthfulness continues to drive the beauty market worldwide, so too has the demand for female hair transplant techniques, especially concerning those tailored for females. Hair loss problems in women are on the rise, with the average age of women getting hair transplants across the USA and Europe estimated at 36 years. In a recent survey, 1,076 women from various countries were analyzed. The study recorded significant levels of distress surrounding the degree of hair loss perceived by those considered to have normal levels when examining a one-week sample of adult females. There is a ‘disturbing mismatch,’ psychologists observed, between the perception of hair loss by women (as an unstoppable disorder) and female hair transplant techniques. Women invest large sums of money in treatment to no net positive effect, covering an array of drugs, experimental procedures, and traditional remedies, often advertised with minimal proof or in secrecy.
One researcher stated that ‘the results should compel more clinicians to take hair loss seriously and consider the emotional impact on women’s lives.’ The last century has seen surgical techniques for restoring hair in men progress rapidly. Conversely, female-specific hair surgery has remained underrepresented, hampered by numerous complex issues including aesthetic outcomes, surgical planning, and ethics. The study essentially centered efforts on socialization factors surrounding hair loss, as there are well-documented psychological consequences from hair loss, which pain and suffering are part of everyday life for many sufferers. Why are more females deciding to opt for surgery? The reason may simply be thinning on the front line, which might relate to an absence of a be-fringe-able style, coupled with the growing influence of celebrities who have openly undertaken such procedures. It seems that the benefit might have just outweighed the stigma and societal objection of admitting to undergoing a cosmetic procedure.
The differences between FUE vs FUT for women techniques historically. Real interest in female hair transplant techniques peaked in the last two decades of the previous century. At that time, strip-based hair transplantation was the most popular technique that was almost the one and only performed method for surgical hair restoration for male and female patients. Therefore, its application was worldwide. Technical development and interest in reconstructive hair restoration have led to the evolution of hair restoration techniques towards individual follicular units. Although the studies and interest in technical development have been fast and efficient, this interest is not universally shared. Simply put, the interest and the studied methods have not provided enough relevance to research.
The aim of this study was to investigate the many different studies and the results of the Fractional Hair Extraction technique, including reports from clinics worldwide that primarily deal with comparison studies, increasing numbers of treated sexes, techniques, instrument refinement, and analysis of complexes as a possible explanation of best hair transplant technique for women survival, up to the explanation of trapping potential of different punch sizes. Thanks to the presence of this study, the clinical data derived from the three most recent years are available, confirmed, and no further results have been obtained in the last year. However, this is what we observed: “The following principles were followed in choosing the female hair transplant techniques and the subsequent follicular unit extraction technique: the patient’s wishes, the technique chosen by the patient, and the technique preferred by the reference clinic doctor, considering the surgical procedure with which they have the most experience and skill. We observed a clear preference for the modern follicular unit extraction technique in treatment. When the classic strip method is chosen, the grafts used in excess are utilized in FUE for women’s hair transplant. In this study, the purpose of including the technique of follicular unit extraction using the micromotor technique is to compare the effects of implanted grafts. The patients included in the study of the comparison of follicular unit extraction techniques indicated that they wanted to have hair follicles collected from the classic method with the line sowing technique or the one-by-one process. A large section of patients also stated that the need for shaving due to the classic method was not considered significant. Based on all these criteria, patients who requested a diagnosis were excluded from this study.
Modern hair restoration offers mainly two female hair transplant techniques: follicular unit extraction (FUE) and follicular unit transplantation (FUT), which correlate with the extraction of grafts from the donor area of a patient’s scalp. Few studies focus on these techniques for female hair restoration. It is of utmost importance because FUE for women’s hair transplant is also applied in women. Female scalp skin is thin and lax, which could contribute to high transection rates and the removal of sticking bundles of hair. For this reason, FUE for women’s hair transplant is broadly favored in patients who already have strip scars. However, when considering first-time hair transplantation patients in women, the question is: Which is the best hair transplant technique for women—FUE vs FUT for women—is better for women? A comparative analysis of the efficiency and efficacy of both methods for women presented in this part is necessary.
The selection of a donor region increases the approximation to the occipital area in both methods, accredited through a high resistance to the androgenetic effect. We assume that a convincing comparative analysis may provide a safer choice of method for upcoming patients. The percentage of satisfied patients closely approximates 90% in women, regardless of the authorization and the workforce of the hair restoration procedure. A clinical study declared that 94.1% of the women assessed the effectiveness of hair restoration as “Perfect” or “Good.”
Several factors determine the selection of the best hair transplant technique for women, such as the severity and pattern of hair loss, donor reserve, density and quality, skin and scalp condition, the presence or excess of fine hair, patient expectations and preferences, lifestyle, occupation, patient tolerance, physician preference, and availability. The patient’s expectations and the physical restrictions are checked carefully for the technique type and the treatment planning. Female hair transplant is a team effort beginning with a detailed discussion about surgical goals, according to the progression of hair loss. An informed examination can help a woman decide on whether she desires no hair transplantation or minimal, moderate, or major transplantation, even based on her long-term expectations. Some women may be quite pleased with some degree of balding, especially within an adult population.
Psychological issues may play an important role in the patient’s decision-making process. As the woman approaches the examined photographs, a surgical plan is created with the patient acting as part of the team. Physiologically, women tend to keep as much of the hair above the fringes, even though it is just there to increase their femininity. Young women who complain about hair loss may also request the FUT method in the surgery. Since the technique of hair transplant has no effect on the incidence and prevalence of hair loss, scalp donor hair in young women may not be enough to cover hair loss for a lifetime. A review of the goals and the anticipated graft counts together with the patient often allows for better understanding for both parties concerning the best hair transplant technique for women planning. Most women can attain a 10-12 cm frontal hairline and achieve up to 30 cm of total harvested grafts when performed in a single day, adjusted with nonsurgical therapies for treating baldness aggressively, preoperative blood testing and examinations, contraception, and pre- and postoperative medications.
We as GOODLOOK clinic have been operating in aesthetic field for more than 12 years with the motto “We care about you”